Wednesday, February 22, 2017

TODAY'S CLASS: pattern for paired readings

===
THIS CLASS MARKS THE END OF THE FIRST OF FOUR SECTIONS OF THE CLASS.
It has the same title as the class does:
>>Why didn't you just fix it anyway?<<
What does this mean? How many meanings could it have? Why might it matter? How could it matter to you? How could it matter very differently to other feminists? to other ...what? 

WHAT SECTION DO WE BEGIN NEXT WEEK? WHAT IS IT CALLED? WHY?
Next week we will return to Mckittrick and add Shotwell this time.
Presenters will be Walker, Peskin, Aftab, Knowles.
How will teams form? Who is presenting on what? talk with Dir. Presentations Peskin 

>>>IT ENDS WITH OUR PAPER SESSIONS 5 APRIL 

===
Wednesday 22 February, Schulman or Wekker
• READINGS: Wekker & Schulman 
(sections worked out with Dir. Presentations: Peskin but individuals should choose which book to be an expert on, and the class as a whole should have read everything)
• PRESENTERS:  Lundy-Harris & Attia

>>ON ARRIVAL: Dir. Posters Hagen will distribute materials for Attendance Portraits and time them for only but all of 2 mins. You can bring materials for these yourselves too.

>>BEFORE BREAK:

• 3:45: PRESENTATION led by Lundy-Harris & Attia ON BOTH WEKKER & SCHULMAN (handouts) will start at 3:45 and go for ONLY TWENTY minutes (timed!)
• at 4:05 Lundy-Harris & Attia facilitate discussion until break at 4:45
IN DISCUSSION: it is the responsibility of the WHOLE class to bring in text details AND CONNECT THEM TO CONTEXT offered by Lundy-Harris & Attia!

>>AFTER BREAK

• 5 pm CONTINUED FACILITATION led by Lundy-Harris & Attia
DISCUSSION on ALL materials from last week and also this week.




it is the responsibility of the WHOLE class to MAKE SYNTHESIZING CONNECTIONS AMONG OUR READINGS and to offer ideas about USING THESE in various contexts and for various purposes. ALSO INCLUDE HANDOUTS, WEBSITES, PODCASTS, VIDEOS and other transmedia! (I know, it's really a lot isn't it! yet the rich entanglements do matter!) 

>>RICH TANGLES OF TRANSCONTEXTUAL TRANSMEDIA 

KK HANDOUTS SO FAR: 
• Lothian. 2016. "Choose not to warn." Feminist Studies 42/3: 1-14.
• King. 2016. "Microaggressions as Boundary Objects." Australian Feminist Studies 31/89: 276-282.
• Davidson. 2017. The Future of Education is Now. Anthropology News. http://www.anthropology-news.org/index.php/2017/01/13/the-future-of-education-is-now/

TRANSMEDIA SO FAR: 
• #LETUSBREATHE Collective: http://www.letusbreathecollective.com
• EMERGENCE From the Wikipedia: Emergence > emergent properties and processes: [emphasis mine] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence  
• Lurie. 2014. "How to Read a Book in Two Hours or Less." Grad Hacker, Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com//blogs/gradhacker/how-read-book-two-hours-or-less  
• Self-care is radical: http://selfcareisradical.tumblr.com
• Jazaieri. How to consume research [on Mindfulness] with a critical eye. http://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/what_we_still_dont_know_about_mindfulness_meditation
• BrenĂ© Brown. Courage is Born of Struggle PODCAST. http://www.onbeing.org/blog/courage-is-born-from-struggle-bren-brown/8601
• What Will The Theme Of Your Life Be In 2017? http://www.dailygood.org/story/1475/what-will-the-theme-of-your-life-be-in-2017-kira-m-newman/
• IDEAS ON FIRE website http://ideasonfire.net

AND
• thoughts on KIT MAKINGS and what you have done and changed and need. 

>>WITH KATIE as we decide: 

WE WILL CONSIDER USING SOME OF THIS TIME after break on paired days FOR PROTOTYPING AND JUST HOW WE WANT TO DO THAT.

===
BRINGING TOGETHER INTERTEXTUALITY, MAKING, NEW MATERIALISMS 


search LINK new materialism intertextuality


See slideshow here: https://www.slideshare.net/margokreole/intertextuality-44208541  

===
Intertextuality > The Electronic Labyrinth (at iath UVA) © 1993-2000 Christopher Keep, Tim McLaughlin, Robin Parmar: http://www2.iath.virginia.edu/elab/hfl0278.html  

"Derived from the Latin intertexto, meaning to intermingle while weaving, intertextuality is a term first introduced by French semiotician Julia Kristeva in the late sixties. In essays such as "Word, Dialogue, and Novel," Kristeva broke with traditional notions of the author's "influences" and the text's "sources," positing that all signifying systems, from table settings to poems, are constituted by the manner in which they transform earlier signifying systems. A literary work, then, is not simply the product of a single author, but of its relationship to other texts and to the strucutures of language itself. "[A]ny text," she argues, "is constructed of a mosaic of quotations; any text is the absorption and transformation of another" (66).

"Intertextuality is, thus, a way of accounting for the role of literary and extra-literary materials without recourse to traditional notions of authorship. It subverts the concept of the text as self-sufficient, hermetic totality, foregrounding, in its stead, the fact that all literary production takes place in the presence of other texts; they are, in effect, palimpsests. For Roland Barthes, who proclaimed the death of the author, it is the fact of intertexuality that allows the text to come into being:

"Any text is a new tissue of past citations. Bits of code, formulae, rhythmic models, fragments of social languages, etc., pass into the text and are redistributed within it, for there is always language before and around the text. Intertextuality, the condition of any text whatsoever, cannot, of course, be reduced to a problem of sources or influences; the intertext is a general field of anonymous formulae whose origin can scarcely ever be located; of unconscious or automatic quotations, given without quotation marks. ("Theory of the Text" 39).
Thus writing is always an iteration which is also a re-iteration, a re-writing which foregrounds the trace of the various texts it both knowingly and unknowingly places and dis-places.

"Intertexts need not be simply "literary"--historical and social determinants are themselves signifying practices which transform and inflect literary practices. (Consider, for example, the influence of the capitalist mode of production upon the rise of the novel.) Moreover, a text is constituted, strictly speaking, only in the moment of its reading. Thus the reader's own previous readings, experiences and position within the cultural formation also form crucial intertexts.

"The concept of intertexuality thus dramatically blurs the outlines of the book, dispersing its image of totality into an unbounded, illimitable tissue of connections and associations, paraphrases and fragments, texts and con-texts. For many hypertext authors and theorists, intertextuality provides an apt description of the kind of textual space which they, like the figures in Remedio Varo's famous "Bordando el Manto Terrestre," find themselves weaving."



search LINK Remedio Varo's famous "Bordando el Manto Terrestre

See also, New Materialism in Contemporary Art: https://newmaterialismincontemporaryart.wordpress.com/2015/0/  

===